Wife’s Angry YouTube Rants Backfire as Husband Wins a Divorce
A playwright who made an international spectacle of her husband’s alleged impotence on YouTube acted in a “cruel and inhuman” manner toward her spouse, a Manhattan judge has ruled.
In granting a divorce to Philip J. Smith, Acting Supreme Court Justice Harold B. Beeler found that Tricia Walsh-Smith’s “exposure” of his private life caused him “enormous mental distress.” While Ms. Walsh-Smith might never “in her wildest dreams” have anticipated that her “public rant” against Mr. Smith, 76, president of the Shubert Foundation, and his daughters would become a media sensation, she nonetheless “persisted in exploiting its popularity,” the judge said.
Ms. Walsh-Smith not only made three more videos to draw attention to her plight, but appeared numerous times on a tabloid TV program to humiliate and “pressure” her husband into giving her a more lucrative financial settlement, the judge noted.
“To this day,” he wrote, Mr. Smith, who has a heart condition and “simply wanted to be left alone,” “is uncertain whether, in defendant’s words a ‘big hammer’ will fall on him, exposing even more embarrassing details of his personal life.” Given Ms. Walsh-Smith’s YouTube postings and “her exploitation thereof in the media circus” that ensued, “there is no doubt that her conduct, taken in its totality, has now so endangered the plaintiff’s physical or mental well-being as to render it unsafe or improper for him to cohabit with the defendant,” the judge concluded in Smith v. Walsh-Smith, 311784/07.
Original Source: New York Law Journal (Noeleen G. Walder), July 22, 2008


